What is the difference between MIT-0 and MIT?
Last updated
TL;DR: MIT-0 code shipped commercially: Yes. MIT-0 is the MIT License with the attribution condition removed.
Is mIT-0 code shipped commercially allowed under MIT No Attribution?
Yes. Every use you described is granted by MIT-0, and nothing you described is prohibited.
License: MIT No Attribution (MIT-0, curated_provisional)
How do MIT-0 and MIT compare?
The table lists each license's duties and notes side by side.
| License | Duties | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| MIT-0 | none | Provided as is, without warranty. No attribution is required, so training on or redistributing it carries no notice condition. |
| MIT | attribution, license_notice | Provided as is, without warranty. |
Combined in one work: compatible.
What else should I know?
- With MIT you must keep the copyright and license notice in copies; with MIT-0 you need not.
What are the sources?
How can I check it myself (free, no key)?
{
"tool": "check_license",
"arguments": {
"license": "MIT-0",
"intended_use": {
"commercial_use": true,
"redistribution": true
}
}
}Computed from a2ally's license profiles; not legal advice. JSON · Markdown
Get a free API key in one call
No card and no email needed. 100 free credits; the license and policy checks stay free without a key.
curl -s -X POST https://www.a2ally.com/v1/accounts/signup -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"accept_terms":true}'
export A2ALLY_API_KEY=rs_... # the api_key from the reply (shown once)
curl -s https://www.a2ally.com/v1/licenses/check -H "Authorization: Bearer $A2ALLY_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"license":"MIT","intended_use":{"commercial_use":true}}'